BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID://NDCP//479092
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260506T034427
VTIMEZONE:America/Chicago
DTSTART:20270210T220000Z
DTEND:20270210T233600Z
UID:479092
SUMMARY:The Risks of Artificial Intelligence - Part 2
LOCATION:Webinar
DESCRIPTION:The Risks of Artificial Intelligence - Part 2\n\n02/10/27 04:00 PM CST\n - 02/10/27 05:36 PM CST\Description:\nAs artificial intelligence (AI) becomes deeply integrated into business operations and decision-making, organizations must recognize that effective oversight extends beyond technical safeguards.The governance, risk and control (GRC) responsibilities of AI also carry a cultural dimension requiring alignment with corporate ethical values ethical principles and accountability structures.Cultural governance emphasizes leadership commitment, employee engagement and cross-function ownership of AI practices to ensure trust and transparency.  AI-related risks – ranging from bias and ethical concerns to regulatory compliance, reputational exposure and operational vulnerabilities necessitate robust control frameworks and proactive mitigation strategies.   These include governance structures, policies, risk assessments, transparency measures, and continuous monitoring.  By embedding cultural governance and mitigation responsibilities into enterprise AI initiatives, organizations can responsibly harness innovation while safeguarding stakeholders, protecting reputation and ensuring sustainable long-term value.
 Note:  This is Part 2 in a two-part series on the risks of AI
 Speakers:Lynn Fountain\Location:\nWebinar\n\n,
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:The Risks of Artificial Intelligence - Part 2<br /><br />02/10/27 04:00 PM CST - 02/10/27 05:36 PM CST<br />Description:<br /><p>As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes deeply integrated into business operations and decision-making, organizations must recognize that effective oversight extends beyond technical safeguards.The governance, risk and control (GRC) responsibilities of AI also carry a cultural dimension requiring alignment with corporate ethical values ethical principles and accountability structures.Cultural governance emphasizes leadership commitment, employee engagement and cross-function ownership of AI practices to ensure trust and transparency. &nbsp;AI-related risks &ndash; ranging from bias and ethical concerns to regulatory compliance, reputational exposure and operational vulnerabilities necessitate robust control frameworks and proactive mitigation strategies. &nbsp; These include governance structures, policies, risk assessments, transparency measures, and continuous monitoring. &nbsp;By embedding cultural governance and mitigation responsibilities into enterprise AI initiatives, organizations can responsibly harness innovation while safeguarding stakeholders, protecting reputation and ensuring sustainable long-term value.</p>

<p>Note: &nbsp;This is Part 2&nbsp;in a two-part series on the risks of AI</p>
<br><b>Speakers:</b><br>Lynn Fountain<br><br />Location:<br />Webinar<br /><br />,  
PRIORITY:3
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
BEGIN:VALARM
TRIGGER:-PT5M
ACTION:DISPLAY
DESCRIPTION:Reminder
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
